A Paper Abstract by Benjamin Grosof

Conflict Handling in Advice Taking and Instruction

by Benjamin N. Grosof

Abstract: We raise and discuss several issues of advice taking and instruction, including: the challenges of very small samples of opinion, and of assimilation with a large, complex prior knowledge base. We focus especially on the problem of conflicting yes/no rules. We observe the availability of natural kinds of information, e.g., authority, reliability, freshness, and specificity, as the basis for reasoning about precedence. By precedence we mean in the sense of resolving conflicts between rules on the basis of qualitative ordinal information.

We propose an approach to this problem of conflict: via defaults and reasoning about such precedence, drawn from knowledge representation and commonsense reasoning. We initially developed this approach in previous work. Here, we elaborate it, abstract it to a more conceptual level, and present it for a machine learning audience. Also, we abstract it away from the details of, and dependency on, one particular non-monotonic logical formalism.

We see the value of this approach not as being all-embracing, but as providing a step towards elements of future approaches to advice-taking and instruction.

Last update: 1-8-98

Up to Benjamin Grosof's Papers page
Up to Benjamin Grosof home page

[ IBM Research home page ]